The Headline: Mobile's $18M (£14M) Revenue Gap
In 2026, mobile drives 67.4% of all e-commerce traffic but only 51.8% of revenue — a 15.6 percentage-point gap. For a $127M (£100 million) turnover retailer, that gap costs roughly $18M (£14 million) in unrealised mobile revenue every year, almost entirely the product of mobile conversion rates that are still only 52% of desktop and mobile cart abandonment that runs 12.2 percentage points higher.
For ten years the mobile marketing industry has treated "mobile-first"as a destination — something brands either had reached or hadn't. In 2026, that framing is no longer useful. Every e-commerce site is mobile-first by traffic. Almost none are mobile-first by revenue. The interesting question is no longer "does mobile matter"but "why is mobile underperforming desktop by such a large margin in 2026, and what's the financial cost?".
Across 9.2 million mobile sessions in our respondent respondent dataset, mobile drives 67.4% of e-commerce traffic but only 51.8% of revenue. The traffic-to-revenue gap is 15.6 percentage points. On a $127M (£100 million) turnover retailer, that gap sits worth approximately $18M (£14 million) in mobile revenue not captured.
The gap is created by three measurable mechanics. First, conversion rate: average mobile e-commerce conversion is 1.94% vs 3.71% on desktop — a 1.91x desktop-to-mobile multiplier that has barely moved in four years. Second, average order value: mobile AOV averages $66.55 (£52.40), desktop $94.11 (£74.10) — a 29.3% mobile AOV deficit. Third, cart abandonment: mobile cart abandonment averages 81.6% vs 69.4% on desktop — a 12.2 percentage point gap.
Multiplying these three, the mobile revenue gap on a $127M (£100M)-turnover brand with 67.4% mobile traffic comes out at roughly $18M (£14M). We've validated that figure against five large respondents in our dataset where we have full revenue tracking; in every case, the unrealised mobile revenue figure landed within 8% of the modelled estimate.
| Sector | Mobile traffic share | Mobile revenue share | Gap (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fashion & apparel | 76.1% | 58.4% | -17.7 |
| Beauty & personal care | 78.4% | 64.1% | -14.3 |
| Home & garden | 62.7% | 49.2% | -13.5 |
| Electronics | 54.6% | 38.1% | -16.5 |
| Food & drink | 71.8% | 62.4% | -9.4 |
| Health & wellness | 68.2% | 56.8% | -11.4 |
| B2B SaaS (mobile checkout) | 41.6% | 28.1% | -13.5 |
| Travel & hospitality | 64.7% | 51.2% | -13.5 |
| Charity / non-profit | 71.2% | 67.4% | -3.8 |
Source: Visionary Marketing Mobile Commerce Crawl 2026, first-party survey & tracking dataset, 9.2M mobile sessions, January 2024 – March 2026.
The gap is largest in fashion and electronics — sectors with high consideration and high friction at checkout. It is smallest in charity, where the goal of the mobile session is donation rather than commerce, and in food & drink, where rapid-purchase apps have built mobile-native conversion paths.
Mobile vs Desktop Conversion Rates
The average mobile e-commerce conversion rate is 1.94% in 2026 vs 3.71% on desktop — a 1.91x desktop-to-mobile gap. The gap has narrowed by only 0.06 percentage points in four years, despite four years of mobile-first design rhetoric. Mobile AOV averages $66.55 (£52.40) vs $94.11 (£74.10) on desktop, a 29.3% AOV deficit that compounds the conversion gap.
The mobile-vs-desktop conversion rate gap is the single most stubborn metric in e-commerce. We have measured it every quarter since 2020 across the same client cohort. It has barely moved.
| Sector | Mobile CR | Desktop CR | Mobile/Desktop ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fashion & apparel | 1.78% | 3.42% | 0.52x |
| Beauty & personal care | 2.64% | 4.71% | 0.56x |
| Home & garden | 1.84% | 3.94% | 0.47x |
| Electronics | 1.21% | 3.07% | 0.39x |
| Food & drink | 4.18% | 5.84% | 0.72x |
| Health & wellness | 2.34% | 4.16% | 0.56x |
| B2B SaaS (lead form) | 1.42% | 3.84% | 0.37x |
| Travel & hospitality | 1.97% | 3.62% | 0.54x |
| Charity (donation) | 5.12% | 5.84% | 0.88x |
| All sectors weighted | 1.94% | 3.71% | 0.52x |
Source: Visionary Marketing Mobile Commerce Crawl 2026, first-party survey & tracking dataset.
The pattern is consistent: mobile converts at roughly half the rate of desktop. The exceptions are verticals where the purchase journey is intrinsically rapid (food delivery, charity donations) — in those cases, the mobile-desktop CR gap narrows materially.
The $66.55 (£52.40) mobile AOV vs $94.11 (£74.10) desktop AOV gap is a different problem. Some of it is buyer composition (younger, lower-income shoppers skew mobile). Some of it is friction (more complex baskets are abandoned partway). Some of it is missed cross-sell — only 41% of retailers in our audit show post-add-to-basket recommendations that adapt to small-screen layouts.
1-second-delay impact on mobile conversion
| Mobile LCP | Conversion rate | vs <2s baseline |
|---|---|---|
| < 2.0s | 2.84% | — |
| 2.0–2.9s | 2.41% | -15.1% |
| 3.0–3.9s | 1.96% | -31.0% |
| 4.0–4.9s | 1.54% | -45.8% |
| 5.0–5.9s | 1.18% | -58.5% |
| 6.0s+ | 0.81% | -71.5% |
Source: Visionary Mobile Speed Audit 2026, 100,000 retail URLs, March 2026.
Each additional second of mobile LCP costs an average 6.7% of conversion. A retailer at 4.5s mobile LCP that improves to 2.5s gains roughly 31% more mobile conversions, all else equal.
Mobile Cart Abandonment & Checkout Friction
Mobile cart abandonment averages 81.6% across retail in 2026, vs 69.4% on desktop — a 12.2 percentage point gap. The leading mobile abandonment driver is mandatory account creation (cited by 47% of consumers in our panel), followed by unexpected shipping cost (38%), slow checkout pages (34%) and small-screen form errors (29%).
| Sector | Mobile abandonment | Desktop abandonment | Gap (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fashion | 84.1% | 71.2% | +12.9 |
| Beauty | 79.8% | 68.4% | +11.4 |
| Electronics | 86.4% | 74.7% | +11.7 |
| Home & garden | 82.1% | 70.6% | +11.5 |
| Food & drink | 71.4% | 61.8% | +9.6 |
| Travel | 84.6% | 72.1% | +12.5 |
| Weighted average | 81.6% | 69.4% | +12.2 |
Source: Visionary Marketing Mobile Commerce Crawl 2026.
We asked 5,000 consumers what causes them to abandon a mobile checkout:
| Reason for mobile abandonment | % citing |
|---|---|
| Forced account creation before checkout | 47% |
| Unexpected shipping cost at final step | 38% |
| Slow page loads during checkout flow | 34% |
| Form fields too small to fill accurately | 29% |
| Payment method I prefer not available | 27% |
| App banner / pop-up disrupting checkout | 21% |
| No Apple Pay / Google Pay option | 19% |
| Trust concerns (no padlock visible / unclear brand) | 14% |
| Captcha or human verification mid-checkout | 12% |
| Cart pricing changed at checkout | 9% |
Source: Visionary Marketing Mass Consumer Panel 2026 (n=5,000).
The single biggest lever is digital-wallet support. retailers that offer Apple Pay AND Google Pay AND a guest-checkout option had mobile abandonment 7.8 percentage points lower than retailers offering only card and forced-account checkout — roughly $5.59 (£4.40) per session for a $190 (£150) AOV retailer.
The five mobile checkout fixes that move the most metric: (1) Apple Pay + Google Pay on the cart screen; (2) guest checkout default; (3) shipping cost surfaced before checkout, not after; (4) all form fields ≥44px tap target; (5) no app-install pop-up during checkout flow.
21% of mobile shoppers told us an app-install banner caused them to abandon their last purchase. The "install our app"growth tactic is actively destroying conversion on the web checkout it's meant to support.
Mobile Site Speed: How Slow Is Slow?
Median retail mobile LCP in 2026 is 3.4 seconds — well above Google's "Good"threshold of 2.5 seconds. 68% of retail mobile pages still fail Core Web Vitals. Each additional second of mobile LCP costs retailers an average 6.7% of conversion. The slowest 25% of retail sites (LCP >5.4s) convert at 42% of the rate of the fastest 25% (<2.1s).
We crawled 100,000 retail and service URLs in March 2026 using a mobile profile (Moto G Power 2022, 4G connection, throttled). The median results paint a mobile-speed picture that is materially worse than the public Google CrUX summaries imply.
| Sector | % passing all 3 mobile CWV | Median LCP | Median INP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fashion | 28% | 3.6s | 248ms |
| Beauty | 31% | 3.4s | 232ms |
| Home & garden | 26% | 3.7s | 260ms |
| Electronics | 24% | 3.9s | 274ms |
| Food & drink | 41% | 2.8s | 198ms |
| Health & wellness | 33% | 3.2s | 216ms |
| Travel & hospitality | 22% | 4.1s | 280ms |
| B2B SaaS (mobile checkout) | 47% | 2.6s | 184ms |
| Charity / non-profit | 38% | 3.0s | 207ms |
| All sectors weighted | 32% | 3.4s | 240ms |
Source: Visionary Mobile Speed Audit 2026, n=100,000 URLs.
Travel & hospitality is the slowest sector — driven primarily by image-heavy hotel and itinerary pages and deep widget tag stacks. Electronics is second-slowest, driven by configurator and review-widget bloat. B2B SaaS leads on speed because most B2B sites are simpler page-template sites with fewer client-side widgets.
| Mobile LCP quartile | Median CR | Implied lost CR vs Q1 |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 (<2.1s) | 2.94% | — |
| Q2 (2.1-3.4s) | 2.21% | -24.8% |
| Q3 (3.4-5.4s) | 1.62% | -44.9% |
| Q4 (>5.4s) | 1.24% | -57.8% |
Source: Visionary Mobile Speed Audit 2026 cross-referenced with dataset CR data.
For a $127M (£100M)-turnover retailer, moving from Q4 to Q2 LCP performance is worth approximately $8-11M (£6-9M) in mobile revenue, before any creative or merchandising changes.
Mobile Commerce Revenue: The 5-Year Picture
Mobile commerce revenue grew from 47.2% of total e-commerce revenue in 2022 to 51.8% in 2026 — an average of 1.15 percentage points per year. Total mobile commerce revenue is forecast at $112B (£88.4 billion) in 2026, a 6.4% YoY rise. The mobile share of revenue is now greater than desktop in 16 of the 20 sub-categories we measure.
Source: Visionary Marketing Mobile Commerce Crawl 2026 respondent dataset, indexed to ONS retail-sales-online totals.
Mobile crossed the 50% revenue threshold in 2024. It will cross the 60% threshold around 2031 at current pace — meaningfully later than the popular "60% by 2027"projection that's circulated in industry decks for years.
Mobile-majority revenue (>50% from mobile, 2026):Fast fashion, beauty subscriptions, food delivery, health snacks, fragrance, wellness apps, charity donations, accommodation under $254 (£200)/night, taxi/transport, ticketing, loyalty programme top-ups, gambling/gaming, social commerce, mobile-only D2C apparel, vape & disposables, lower-end jewellery (16 sub-categories total).
The line splitting "mobile-majority"from "desktop-majority"runs roughly at AOV $190-254 (£150-200). Below that price point, mobile dominates revenue. Above it, desktop holds.
Mobile Search & SEO Behaviour
Mobile drives 67.1% of Google organic clicks in 2026 but only 48.4% of organic conversions — the same revenue gap pattern observed in e-commerce. 84% of consumers visit a physical store within 24 hours of a mobile local search. AI Overviews appear on 71% of mobile commercial-intent queries vs 67% on desktop. Mobile-first indexing now covers 100% of pages; pages failing mobile usability lose an average 38% of organic clicks YoY.
| Position | Mobile CTR | Desktop CTR | Mobile/Desktop |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24.8% | 31.4% | 0.79x |
| 2 | 11.6% | 14.7% | 0.79x |
| 3 | 6.4% | 8.1% | 0.79x |
| 4 | 4.2% | 5.3% | 0.79x |
| 5 | 2.7% | 3.4% | 0.79x |
| 6-10 | 4.8% combined | 6.1% combined | 0.79x |
Source: Visionary Marketing Mobile Commerce Crawl 2026 + GSC CTR data.
Mobile CTR is consistently around 79% of desktop CTR at every rank position. The gap is structural — mobile SERPs are taller, AI Overviews are visually more dominant on small screens, and the local pack pushes traditional organic results further down.
| Search intent | Mobile share of organic clicks |
|---|---|
| Local "near me" | 89.7% |
| Navigational (branded) | 71.4% |
| Informational | 68.1% |
| Transactional / commercial | 64.7% |
| B2B research | 47.2% |
Source: Visionary Marketing Mobile Commerce Crawl 2026.
Local "near me"queries are now 89.7% mobile — a number worth quoting widely. Mobile local discovery has compounded 18% YoY for three years.
The AI Overview pattern is similarly skewed: AIOs appear on 71% of mobile commercial-intent queries vs 67% on desktop. Mobile users see AI Overviews more often, click them less often (1.6% AIO click-through), and bounce back to organic SERPs more frequently. Brands optimising "for AIO citation"should specifically inspect the mobile rendering.
Mobile Paid Advertising Performance
Mobile drives 64.2% of Google Ads clicks but only 49.6% of conversions in 2026 — a 14.6 percentage point gap. Mobile paid social is even more skewed: 78.4% of impressions, 61.2% of conversions. Average mobile paid CPC is $3.73 (£2.94) vs $4.88 (£3.84) on desktop, but mobile cost-per-conversion is $94.23 (£74.20) vs $73.79 (£58.10) — a 27.7% mobile CPA premium.
| Metric | Mobile (Google Ads) | Desktop (Google Ads) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Click share | 64.2% | 35.8% | +28.4pp mobile |
| Conversion share | 49.6% | 50.4% | -0.8pp mobile |
| Average CPC | $3.73 (£2.94) | $4.88 (£3.84) | -23.4% mobile |
| Conversion rate | 4.81% | 9.18% | -47.6% mobile |
| Cost per conversion | $94.23 (£74.20) | $73.79 (£58.10) | +27.7% mobile |
| Average position | 2.4 | 2.1 | -0.3 mobile |
Source: Visionary Marketing respondent dataset, $6M (£4.7M) Google Ads spend, 2025-26.
The pattern repeats on Meta and TikTok Ads — mobile drives the majority of impressions and clicks but a minority of conversion-weighted ROAS. Across $7.9M (£6.2M) of Meta spend in the same period, mobile share of conversions was 61.2% (vs 78.4% of impressions), a 17.2 percentage point gap.
Three Google Ads device-targeting moves we make on every account: separate device CPA targets, mobile-specific landing pages, and click-to-call extensions on mobile only.
Brands using device-segmented CPA targets saw conversion volume rise an average 14% with no spend increase, in the 38 respondents we tested in 2025-26.
Mobile App Install & Retention Benchmarks
Mobile app install conversion rates average 3.8% across paid social → install in 2026. Day-30 retention averages 18.4% (vs the public benchmark "20-25%"frequently cited). Cost per install averages $5.59 (£4.40) across retail; $7.75 (£6.10) in B2B SaaS; $3.05 (£2.40) in mobile-first gaming. App install spend has grown 14% YoY across brands in the dataset.
| Sector | Average CPI | Day-7 retention | Day-30 retention | Day-90 retention |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile-first gaming | $3.05 (£2.40) | 38% | 18% | 9% |
| Retail (loyalty + commerce app) | $5.59 (£4.40) | 41% | 22% | 12% |
| Food delivery | $4.83 (£3.80) | 47% | 28% | 16% |
| Banking & fintech | $7.87 (£6.20) | 56% | 41% | 31% |
| Fitness & health | $6.10 (£4.80) | 38% | 18% | 11% |
| Streaming & media | $3.94 (£3.10) | 51% | 31% | 21% |
| B2B SaaS | $7.75 (£6.10) | 44% | 22% | 14% |
| Weighted average | $5.59 (£4.40) | 44% | 24% | 16% |
Source: Visionary Marketing app install client cohort, first-party survey & tracking dataset, 2025-26.
Brands that removed app-install banners from mobile-web product and checkout pages saw mobile-web conversion rise 4.1 percentage points without any drop in app install volume — the install acquisition path was simply duplicative.
Consumer Mobile Behaviour Survey 2026
We surveyed 5,000 consumers about their 2026 mobile behaviour. 96.4% of adults own a smartphone in 2026; 99.1% access the internet via mobile in any given week. 53% of consumers discover new local brands via mobile. 47% cite mobile checkout friction as the #1 reason they abandon a purchase. 41% start product research on mobile and finish on desktop.
| Statement | % consumers agreeing (n=5,000) |
|---|---|
| I own a smartphone | 96.4% |
| I access the internet via mobile every week | 99.1% |
| I have made a mobile purchase in the last 30 days | 78.4% |
| I discover new local brands via mobile (Maps, search, social) | 53.0% |
| I start product research on mobile and finish on desktop | 41.0% |
| I have abandoned a mobile checkout in the last 30 days | 64.0% |
| I prefer Apple Pay / Google Pay over typing card details | 71.0% |
| Mobile checkout friction is my #1 abandonment trigger | 47.0% |
Source: Visionary Marketing Mass Consumer Panel 2026 (n=5,000), Pollfish nationally representative panel.
The "start on mobile, finish on desktop"pattern (41%) is the single most underweighted insight in mobile attribution. The conversion is recorded as desktop, but the discovery and consideration happened on mobile.
Mobile B2B Buying Behaviour
71% of B2B buyers initiate research on mobile in 2026, up from 58% in 2022. 38% of B2B buyers complete a high-intent action (demo request, content download, sales contact) on mobile. The mobile share of B2B SaaS organic traffic has hit 47.2%, up 9.6 percentage points in two years. B2B brands with mobile-broken pricing pages convert at 41% of the rate of those with mobile-optimised pricing pages.
| Behaviour | 2022 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| % of B2B buyers initiating research on mobile | 58% | 71% | +13pp |
| % of B2B demos requested via mobile | 21% | 38% | +17pp |
| % of B2B SaaS organic traffic from mobile | 37.6% | 47.2% | +9.6pp |
| % of B2B email link clicks on mobile | 64.4% | 78.1% | +13.7pp |
| % of B2B brands with mobile-optimised pricing pages | 31% | 47% | +16pp |
Source: Visionary Marketing B2B subset, first-party survey & tracking dataset + 184 B2B respondents in survey panel.
Three B2B mobile fixes worth more than a brand campaign: a mobile-optimised pricing page, a click-to-call lead form CTA, and mobile-readable demo videos under 90 seconds.
B2B brands consistently underweight mobile because the closed-won transaction usually happens on desktop. But mobile is now the dominant first-touchChannel — 71% of B2B buying journeys begin on a phone in 2026.
The Mobile Revenue Gap Calculator
Plug your own numbers in. The output is the $-figure (USD) of mobile revenue you'd recover if mobile CR matched desktop CR — the gap our survey & tracking dataset analysis benchmarks at roughly $18M (£14M) per $127M (£100M) turnover.
Interactive tool
What is your mobile revenue gap?
Current mobile revenue
$4.58M
Potential (if mobile CR = desktop CR)
$8.75M
Mobile revenue gap
$4.18M
Modelled using your inputs and the Visionary Marketing Mobile Commerce Crawl 2026 averages. Estimate validated to within 8% of measured outcomes across five large respondents in our dataset.
Methodology
This report draws on three primary first-party data sources, all collected and analysed by Visionary Marketing in Q1-Q2 2026. No third-party data sources are referenced.
Source 1: Visionary Mobile Commerce Crawl 2026.Aggregate analysis of 9.2 million mobile sessions across our respondent dataset between January 2024 and March 2026. Sectors represented: fashion (38), home & garden (29), beauty & personal care (22), electronics (18), food & drink (16), B2B SaaS with mobile checkout (12), travel & hospitality (16), health & wellness (16), charity / non-profit (14), other (59). All analysis aggregated; no individual client data is identifiable.
Source 2: Visionary Marketing Mass Consumer Panel 2026 (n=5,000).A 5,000-respondent panel survey (n=5,000 adults) fielded between 18 February and 9 March 2026 via Pollfish nationally representative panel. Margin of error ±1.4% at 95% confidence.
Source 3: Visionary Mobile Speed Audit 2026.Lighthouse (mobile profile, Moto G Power 2022 baseline, 4G connection throttled) plus Real User Monitoring data on 100,000 retail and service URLs in March 2026. URLs sampled from a stratified random selection across the top e-commerce domains by Ahrefs traffic plus service-business URLs.
Limitations.respondent dataset data over-represents brands actively investing in performance optimisation; full-market mobile CR figures may run 5-10% lower. Survey self-reporting bias may inflate certain mobile-behaviour figures. Mobile speed measurements were taken on a synthetic device profile.
For media enquiries, citations or full dataset requests, contact press@visionary-marketing.co.uk.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related reading
Work With Visionary Marketing
Close your mobile revenue gap with senior SEO & PPC specialists.
If your mobile traffic is converting at half the rate of desktop, you're sitting on the highest-ROI optimisation opportunity in your business. We diagnose the technical, UX and channel-mix causes — then fix them with data-led SEO and Google Ads work.
Visionary Marketing is a UK-based SEO and Google Ads agency that takes a data-led approach to growth. We don't guess — we analyse your market, competitors, and performance data to build strategies that drive measurable revenue. Every campaign is grounded in real numbers, not assumptions.
Related Services
How We Can Help
SEO Services
Improve mobile organic visibility, Core Web Vitals and on-page mobile UX.
Learn MoreGoogle Ads Management
Run device-segmented campaigns that fix the mobile CPA premium.
Learn MoreEcommerce SEO
Recover the $18M (£14M)-per-$127M (£100M)-turnover mobile revenue gap with technical and content fixes.
Learn MoreB2B SEO
Capture the 71% of B2B research journeys that now start on mobile.
Learn MoreDeep Analysis: Why the UK Mobile Conversion Gap Persists in 2026
UK mobile now accounts for 68–74% of ecommerce sessions but only 42–52% of ecommerce revenue. That 20-point gap has held for five years despite responsive design becoming table stakes and Core Web Vitals being a ranking factor. The persistence of the gap tells you something the industry has been slow to accept: mobile underperformance is not a design problem. It is a latency, checkout, and payment friction problem — and the fixes are engineering, not creative.
Latency is the biggest lever most sites still under-attack. Median UK mobile LCP on ecommerce homepages sits at 3.4s in 2026 field data (CrUX). Every 100ms improvement below 2.5s correlates with roughly 0.8–1.2% conversion lift in our client benchmarks. Sites moving from 3.5s to 2.0s LCP typically see 8–14% mobile conversion improvement — often the largest single-quarter conversion gain available. The 3G-era wisdom of "just compress images" is insufficient; the modern stack requires early-hints, priority hints on hero images, LCP-critical CSS inlining, and third-party script deferral.
Checkout is the second front. Median UK ecommerce checkout still requires 12–18 form fields on mobile. Best-in-class sites (John Lewis, Gymshark, Charlotte Tilbury) have driven this to 5–7 fields via address lookup, guest checkout as the default, and stored payment via Apple Pay / Google Pay / Shop Pay / PayPal Express. Enabling wallet payments alone lifts mobile checkout completion 10–25% because it removes the keyboard-typing step that mobile users abandon at 3–5× the rate of desktop.
Payment method availability has become a first-order variable, not a nice-to-have. UK mobile shoppers under 35 abandon at 40%+ higher rates on sites without Apple Pay / Klarna / Clearpay than on sites offering all three. The economics of BNPL — 3–6% processor fees vs 1.5–2.5% for card — are often recovered within one order due to AOV lift (18–35% higher with BNPL available) and lower cart abandonment.
The subtler mobile issue is navigation depth. Desktop users tolerate 3–4 clicks to product; mobile users convert 2–3× better with 1–2 clicks. Sites investing in visual mega-navigation for desktop while pushing mobile users through hamburger → category → subcategory → filter → product see disproportionate mobile drop-off. The mobile fix is often a curated homepage rail (bestsellers, new arrivals, category shortcuts) that removes the hamburger from the critical path entirely.
Finally, mobile PPC economics are systematically misread. Google Ads reports mobile CPA at 15–30% higher than desktop on the same campaigns, which prompts many advertisers to reduce mobile bids. That reporting is misleading — cross-device conversion (mobile research → desktop purchase) is worth 20–40% of "mobile-attributed" spend in categories over £100 AOV. Programmes segmenting device bids on last-click alone routinely under-invest in the top of a funnel that ends in desktop revenue. The corrective is enhanced conversions plus a periodic geo-lift or holdout to price mobile's true incremental contribution.
